Substrate MD

A simpler way to manage metabolic care

One clinic worklist. One patient story. Clinicians stay in control.

Substrate MD reconciles scattered reports, sorts the work that needs attention, and brings evidence, plans and follow-through into one patient workspace. AI can prepare; a clinician reviews and approves.

Controlled deployments only. Real patient data remains disabled until the clinic and operator complete the activation gates.

Current evidenceHbA1c
5.9%Worth a look
Clinic target
Below 5.7%
Source interval
4.8–5.6%
Observed
18 Aug 2026
Source
Laboratory report · page 2

Inside neither claim. The clinic target and the reporting laboratory’s interval remain separate and visible.

The coordination gap

The clinical story is spread across systems. The decision still lands on one person.

Laboratory reports, PNOĒ, body-composition systems, CGM, sleep studies, intake forms and the EHR each hold part of the picture. Reconstructing what is current, comparable and actionable should not consume the visit.

Laboratory reportsPNOĒInBodyDEXACGMSleepFHIR / C-CDA

Inside the product

Start with the clinic. Drill into one patient. Close the work.

SubstrateMD is not only a report reader or an AI summary. It is the working surface that connects clinic-wide attention, patient-level evidence, accountable decisions and follow-through.

01

Clinic worklist

Start with data conflicts, results outside target, overdue follow-ups and plans due for review—ranked across the clinic instead of buried patient by patient.

A ranked queue supports attention; it never replaces clinical priority-setting.
02

One-glance patient workspace

Open the priorities, metabolic score, care areas, current plan and open work first. Measurements, source evidence and the full clinical detail stay one deliberate step deeper.

A summary never erases the evidence or the uncertainty behind it.
03

Human review queue

Resolve low-confidence extraction, unmapped measurements, duplicate records and conflicting sources with the context needed to decide—not a warning with nowhere to act.

Unknown or incompatible data is held for a person, not silently normalised.
04

Plans and follow-through

Carry goals, contraindications, reviewed protocols, versioned care plans, patient questions and assigned follow-ups through one accountable coordination path.

Drafts remain drafts until a named clinician approves the decision.

The working model

Add → Understand → Review → Finish

01

Add & check

Bring reports and patient information together. SubstrateMD flags missing details and conflicts instead of guessing.

02

See what matters

Start with the most important findings, then open the measurements and sources behind them when you need to.

03

Review the draft

AI can prepare a visit brief and care-plan starting point. A clinician keeps, changes or rejects every suggestion.

04

Finish the work

Give each question and follow-up an owner and due date so important patient work does not get lost.

Evidence before decoration

A value ledger, not a dashboard of bare numbers.

Every adopted value retains its reported and canonical form, observation date, source location, parser identity, trust state and lineage. Conflicts remain visible objects; calculated values name their actual inputs.

SourceQuest laboratory reportPage 2 · result row 14
Canonical valueApolipoprotein B · 96 mg/dLParser v3 · verified
JudgementOutside clinic targetRule set v12 · evidence available

Clinical safety boundary

AI prepares. Clinicians decide.

Rules check the numbers

Targets, trends, safety checks and treatment context use visible, versioned rules—not an AI guess.

AI prepares a starting point

AI may draft a brief or plan. It cannot diagnose, choose between conflicting values, or approve care.

A person handles uncertainty

Missing units, unclear dates, old measurements and source conflicts stop for human review instead of being hidden.

Supported input paths

Built for ordinary clinic exports, with honest support boundaries.

The deterministic pipeline handles supported PDF, CSV, TSV, XML/FHIR, C-CDA, JSON, PNG, JPEG and HEIC inputs. Quest/generic laboratories and published layouts are covered; Jane batch, DEXA, CGM, sleep and exact InBody variants remain “validation in progress” until de-identified real samples pass.

SupportedContent detection, encrypted originals, OCR fallback, receipts, conflict review
Validation in progressClinic-specific vendor layouts and batch exports
Never impliedNo fabricated partner logos, certification claims or autonomous decisions

Privacy and security

Designed for HIPAA-regulated clinical workflows.

Per-clinic encrypted databases, MFA-gated clinical capability, bounded break-glass access, tamper-evident audit chains, encrypted backups and strict no-PHI audit detail are implemented controls. “HIPAA compliant,” “tamper-proof” and “fully integrated” are not claims this site makes.

Read the precise security posture →

Deployment evidence

Patient access opens only after measured gates and two accountable decisions.

The activation workroom turns the current setup into five staff-only evidence packs without patient data. It prepares protocol review, target change control, source and vendor evidence, validation and AI-governance material, and the complete launch register.

System measuresThe current checklist state and evidence digest
Clinic owner requestsApproval against that exact measured snapshot
Operator confirmsA separately signed-in person verifies the same evidence
Nothing fabricatedGenerated packs leave reviewer, decision and approval fields blank

A deliberate first conversation

Show us how your clinic reconstructs the story today.

We are working directly with metabolic practices while deployment, workflow and clinical-validation boundaries are proven.

Request a design-partner conversation